by Gord Hotchkiss
I've got a question for you: would you want to do anything with Kevin Federline? Personally, the more Federline-free my world is, the better. But apparently other people don't see it that way. You may have noticed earlier this week that K-Fed is actually launching his own search engine. Well, to be more accurate, he's slapping his face on an existing back end, so to speak. I won't go into the details of the K-Fed engine, except to say that it's powered by Yahoo and it's offered by Prodege.com.
Par-Tee with Britney's Ex!
Apparently, making this your primary search engine could open the door to a chance to win tickets to Kevin's private birthday party (I would rather wear Fiberglas underwear), T-shirts and other paraphernalia all related to the somewhat questionable K-Fed brand. Apparently, an invite to K-Fed's birthday party is "a once in a lifetime opportunity." This has the ring of truth, as I might consider killing myself if I actually won.
This got me thinking. If we're in the era of consumer generated media, are we also in the area of consumer generated celebrities? Does the increasing fragmentation of our society through an explosion of online channels mean that even marginal celebs like Kevin Federline get their own small sliver of fame? If we have enough Kevin Federline fans somewhere, and the Web has empowered them to have a voice unlike anything they may have been able to have before, is there a place for a Kevin Federline search engine? And, if so, does the future hold the promise of a profusion of celebrity skinned search sites?
Google Dresses Up Your Home Page
Ironically, Google also made an announcement this week releasing six themes for their personalized homepage. In this case, Google went out of their way to make sure that the themes are not commercial in any way. In Google's words, these themes are all about "art and personality". The new Google themes are clever, in that they are location sensitive and have some cool little twists designed to "delight" users. For example, some of the scenes show outdoor scenes and the sun rises and sets in sync with where you happen to be located. With a Google theme installed, you may never have to look out your window again. But in a conversation with Google, they made a point of saying that they're hesitant to open up an API to Google themes, for fear that it would cause a rush of commercialized skins, which could encroach on the user experience.
Blatant Commercialism is Skin Deep
Commercially oriented skins are nothing new, of course. Movies have released custom skins for MP3 players and other online apps that bury functionality under a sea of advertising spin. There are hundreds and thousands of desktop themes, wallpaper and screen savers with a commercial bent. But up to this point, search has been relatively "spin free", save of course for the advertising on the actual results page. But at least I don't have to look at Kevin Federline when I'm searching for the symptoms of gout or trying to find an update patch for my latest Windows problems.
Just Give Me My Results, darn it!
Based on a few new entries in the search space, it suddenly seems like we need personality mixed in with our search functionality. Search innovator K-Fed is not the only one pointing us in this direction. Microsoft has been playing around with Ms. Dewey (again an unfortunate choice of words), with the assumption that an undeniably attractive but distinctively bitchy female guide standing in front of a Blade Runner-esque streetscape will somehow make our search experience more complete. Perhaps Ms. Dewey could be K-Fed�s rebound after his split with Britney. Or perhaps both of them should have a cup of tea with Jeeves and see how being a search mascot worked out for him.
My feeling is that we want search to be a pristine experience. We wanted it to be minimalist and we want to start from a neutral palette. We are so focused on intent and the task at hand when we interact with search that anything that gets in the way is simply a distraction. It adds nothing to the user experience. Search is very utilitarian task. We get in, find what we're looking for and get out. However, with the lion share of the search market tied up in the hands of so few playe