Promotion Data: A Frog in Boiling Water: Is the Fortune 500 Client All They’re Cracked up to Be?

by Gord Hotchkiss
http://www.enquiro.com

P&G’s new CEO, Bob McDonald was asked, in a recent interview with Ad Age, what keeps him up at night:

The biggest thing is the parable of the frog in the boiling water. That’s why today, of the Fortune 50 from 1955, only nine of those companies still exist. P&G is one of them. I want P&G to be on that list 172 years from now, because that means we’re touching and improving more lives. The only thing that can kick us off that list is complacency or inability to learn new things or unwillingness to change.

The Allure of the Trophy Client

In search, we love to deal with marquis clients. We love to put the brag badges on our website, the list of logos showing the Fortune 500’s we all deal with. A quick non-scientific survey shows that every digital and search agency in the world has worked with HP, IBM, Microsoft, P&G and GE. If one is to believe the plethora of logos slathered over the web, these companies have more agencies of record than employees.

I get the temptation. I really do. In search, we all struggle for credibility. These clients bring the sheer mass of immediate credibility with them – if you’re good enough for P&G, you’re good enough for me. Come on, admit it! We’ve all done it. We’ve all slipped the logos into our PowerPoint “About Us” slide.

But McDonald’s observation deserves our attention. The Fortune 50 in 1955 only had an 18% survival rate. I suspect the toil will get even greater as the digital landscape accelerates the pace of online marketing evolution dramatically. This means that dinosaurs will be dropping right and left. And as the lumbering behemoths keel over and crash to the primordial forest floor, might we SEMs be caught under them?

How Do You Steer an Elephant?

Look at McDonald’s trio of evolutionary sins: complacency, the inability to learn new things and the unwillingness to change. My suspicion is, despite the reams of rhetoric to the contrary in the typical annual report, that McDonald’s fears represent the norm rather than the exception for the average Fortune 500 Corporation. I applaud his self-awareness, but can’t help but wonder if even a tuned-in CEO is enough to overcome the inertia, bureaucracy and legacy investment that typify many mammoth multinationals?

And if the CEO can’t change the direction, how the hell is a search agency expected to? For a puny little search agency (and let’s face it, compared to the sheer bulk of a Fortune 500, we’re all puny) to try to change the direction of one of these corporations is like a spider spinning a web to stop a stampede of pachyderms before they plunge off a cliff. I give it an “A+” for intention, but an “F” for grasp of reality.

Where Do You Invest Your Time?

So, this brings up the acutely pertinent question, what is a better investment of an SEM’s time and resources: fighting the inertia of those marquis clients so we can use their logos on our websites, or actually doing something with the clients that will eventually replace them in the inevitable march of marketplace evolution?

It’s a good question to ask. And, philosophically anyway, not a hard question to answer. But in practice, well..in the words of Hamlet…Ay, there’s the rub.

Perhaps, for a select few companies, the two categories are not mutually exclusive. Perhaps the answer lies in CEO’s like Bob McDonald, who can steer at least some of the Fortune 500 safely into a new digital reality. Let’s hope there are more where he came from.

Copyright 2008 - Enquiro Search Solutions.